You are here
Citibank, three others fail US stress test
WASHINGTON—Four major US banks failed to show they have enough capital to survive another serious downturn, the Federal Reserve said yesterday. The list included Citigroup, the nation’s third-largest bank. The Fed said 15 of the19 major banks tested passed. The Fed noted that all 19 banks are in a much stronger position than immediately after the 2008 financial crisis.
Still, SunTrust, Ally Financial and MetLife joined Citi in failing to meet the test’s minimum capital requirements. The Fed reviewed the bank balance sheets to determine whether they could withstand a crisis that sends unemployment to 13 per cent, causes stock prices to be cut in half and lowers home prices 21 per cent from today’s levels.
Citi’s failure came as a shock. Analysts were expecting the bank to pass, especially after it reported two years of profits. Some analysts expected the bank to be able to increase its dividend to ten cents a share and even buy back stock. Citi’s stock fell 4 per cent in the after-market.
For those banks that failed, the Fed can stop them from paying stock dividends or buying back their own stock. The Fed can also force them to raise money by selling additional stock or issuing debt. Last year, the Fed allowed some banks—including JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo—to raise their dividends because they were deemed healthier.
The Fed has conducted the stress tests each year since 2009. This was the first time since then that the results have been made public. The Fed released the results two days earlier than planned after JPMorgan sent out a press release saying it had passed the test. After the first round of tests, in 2009, the Fed ordered ten banks to raise a total of $75 billion. Bank of America alone was told to raise $34 billion.
This year’s test is more rigorous than earlier tests because the Fed wanted to be assured that the industry is prepared to meet more stringent international banking rules that go into effect in 2013.
Disclaimer
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff. Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Please help us keep out site clean from inappropriate comments by using the flag option.
Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments. Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.
Before posting, please refer to the Community Standards, Terms and conditions and Privacy Policy